On Tuesday 15th we had a lecture delivered by Chris, in which he analysed an installation he was involved in, called
Pleasant Land, made in 2002/3.
He discussed various things about it that could relate to our projects and any future work; that material for installation can come from anywhere, even from the process of producing other work, that funding is precarious even after it has promised, and that despite the installation not turning out how you intended it to, the show must go on!
He told us about the 'documentation' for our projects; that we should film people interacting with our pieces, as well as taking photos and gathering comments via a visitor's book. He also explained the importance of marketing; to hand out flyers for the exhibition to visitors, have an explanation of the work on the wall, and to let local and national press know that the exhibition is happening, to exploit contacts and social media like Facebook. He suggested invitations for opening night need to go out one month before the event and flyers a fortnight before, and to look into submission dates for magazines and papers etc.
In general he told us not to be afraid of controversy, i.e. shoehorn sex in somewhere! and to allow time for exploration in the edit.
Afterwards we had a tutorial with Chris. We informed him of our trouble finding a male lead, and so had decided to change the character to a female; he seemed to like this idea as a creative solution to the problem, that it could actually make the piece more interesting. He asked to see our shooting schedule as soon as possible.
We also discussed assistants and health and safety on the shoot, and to get the heath and safety regulations from Bank Street as soon as possible. He reassured us that the documentation doesn't have to be of brilliant quality in terms of visuals or narrative, just as long as it is done and handed in with the rest of the work on the 13th May.
He seems confident that we can produce a good piece of work, so I am trying to draw reassurance from that!